ScholarGate
Assistent

Jämför metoder

Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.

En matchad studie av diagnostisk träffsäkerhet×tvärsnittsstudie inom epidemiologi×
ÄmnesområdeEpidemiologiEpidemiologi
FamiljProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ursprungsår1990s–2000s (formalised with STARD 2003)1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century
UpphovspersonEvolved from matched case-control methodology; STARD standards formalised by Bossuyt et al. (2003)Classical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)
TypDiagnostic / clinical epidemiology study designObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design
UrsprungskällaBossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. BMJ, 326(7379), 41–44. DOI ↗Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407
Aliasmatched DAS, paired diagnostic accuracy study, matched test accuracy study, matched sensitivity-specificity studyprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design
Närliggande46
SammanfattningA matched diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well an index test correctly identifies a target condition in study participants who have been matched on key characteristics — such as age, sex, or disease severity — to control for confounding. By pairing diseased and non-diseased subjects on relevant factors before administering the test, the design isolates the test's own discriminative performance from variation attributable to imbalanced covariates, yielding cleaner estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and related accuracy measures.A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.
ScholarGateDatamängd
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå till sökningen Ladda ner bildspel

ScholarGateJämför metoder: Matched Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Cross-sectional epidemiological study. Hämtad 2026-06-18 från https://scholargate.app/sv/compare