ScholarGate
Assistent

Jämför metoder

Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.

Matchad tvärsnittsstudie inom epidemiologi×Matchad kohortstudie×
ÄmnesområdeEpidemiologiEpidemiologi
FamiljProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
UrsprungsårMid-to-late 20th century (formalized ~1970s–1990s)Mid-20th century; propensity-score variant 1983
UpphovspersonDeveloped within the tradition of observational epidemiology; matching principles codified by Greenland, Rothman, and Kelsey in modern epidemiology textsEstablished practice; propensity-score matching formalized by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)
TypObservational epidemiological study designObservational analytic study design
UrsprungskällaRothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Aliasmatched cross-sectional survey, matched prevalence study, matched cross-sectional design, frequency-matched cross-sectional studymatched follow-up study, paired cohort study, propensity-matched cohort, matched prospective study
Närliggande55
SammanfattningA matched cross-sectional epidemiological study is an observational design that measures exposure and outcome simultaneously in a population sample while applying matching to control for one or more confounding variables. By pairing or grouping participants on key characteristics such as age, sex, or socioeconomic status before or during analysis, the design reduces confounding bias without requiring longitudinal follow-up, making it efficient for estimating prevalence and cross-sectional associations.A matched cohort study is an observational design in which each exposed participant is paired with one or more unexposed counterparts who share key characteristics — such as age, sex, or comorbidity status — before both groups are followed forward in time to compare incident outcomes. Matching controls for measured confounders at the design stage, reducing bias that would otherwise require statistical adjustment alone.
ScholarGateDatamängd
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå till sökningen Ladda ner bildspel

ScholarGateJämför metoder: Matched Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study · Matched Cohort Study. Hämtad 2026-06-18 från https://scholargate.app/sv/compare