Jämför metoder
Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.
| Longitudinal In-depth Interview× | Halvstrukturerad intervju× | |
|---|---|---|
| Ämnesområde≠ | Surveymetodik | Kvalitativa metoder |
| Familj | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ursprungsår≠ | 1990s–2000s (as a formalised qualitative method) | 1946 (Merton & Kendall); codified as a standard method through the 1980s–1990s |
| Upphovsperson≠ | Rooted in qualitative longitudinal research traditions; systematised by Johnny Saldana | Robert K. Merton and Patricia Kendall (focused interview, 1946); further systematised by Steinar Kvale |
| Typ≠ | Qualitative longitudinal data collection technique | Qualitative research method |
| Ursprungskälla≠ | Saldana, J. (2003). Longitudinal Qualitative Research: Analyzing Change Through Time. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759103917 | Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761925422 |
| Alias | repeated in-depth interview, longitudinal qualitative interview, panel qualitative interview, longitudinal IDI | guided interview, semi-standardized interview, focused interview, SSI |
| Närliggande≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Sammanfattning≠ | Longitudinal in-depth interviewing is a qualitative data collection technique in which the same participants are interviewed in depth on multiple occasions across a defined time span. By revisiting the same people over weeks, months, or years, researchers can trace how experiences, identities, attitudes, and meanings change — something a single interview cannot reveal. It is widely used in life-course research, health studies, education, and social policy. | The semi-structured interview is a qualitative data-collection method in which the researcher prepares a set of key questions or topic areas in advance but remains free to probe, follow up, and reorder as the conversation evolves. Unlike structured interviews — which fix every question and sequence — or unstructured interviews — which are entirely open — the semi-structured format balances comparability across participants with the flexibility needed to capture the depth and nuance of individual perspectives. It is the most widely used interview format in social science, health, and education research. |
| ScholarGateDatamängd ↗ |
|
|