Jämför metoder
Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.
| Inbäddad kvalitativt prioriterad mixad design× | Kvalitativ-prioriterad mixed methods-design× | |
|---|---|---|
| Ämnesområde | Forskningsdesign | Forskningsdesign |
| Familj | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ursprungsår≠ | 2007 (first edition of Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research) | 1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies) |
| Upphovsperson≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark | Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Typ | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Ursprungskälla≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1483358468 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Alias | qual-dominant embedded design, qualitative-primary embedded MMR, embedded QUAL+quan design, nested qualitative-priority design | QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods |
| Närliggande≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Sammanfattning≠ | The embedded qualitative-priority mixed design nests a secondary quantitative strand within a dominant qualitative inquiry. The qualitative strand drives the research logic, framing the questions, guiding data collection, and anchoring interpretation, while the quantitative component plays a supporting role — typically measuring outcomes, tracking context variables, or confirming patterns emerging from the qualitative core. The result is a rich, theoretically grounded account that remains rooted in participants' meanings while gaining empirical precision where needed. | Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story. |
| ScholarGateDatamängd ↗ |
|
|