Jämför metoder
Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.
| Delphi-metoden – iterativ expertkonsensus för framtagning av kriterieviktning× | ARTASI× | |
|---|---|---|
| Ämnesområde | Beslutsfattande | Beslutsfattande |
| Familj | MCDM | MCDM |
| Ursprungsår≠ | 1963 | 2024 |
| Upphovsperson≠ | Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. | Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. |
| Typ≠ | Weight_Subjective (expert consensus, iterative Likert/ranking) | Two-level standardization + ideal/anti-ideal utility (β-anchored) |
| Ursprungskälla≠ | Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science DOI ↗ | Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. (2024). A picture fuzzy CIMAS-ARTASI model for website performance analysis in human resource management. Applied Soft Computing DOI ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Närliggande | 8 | 8 |
| Sammanfattning≠ | DELPHI (Delphi Method — iterative expert consensus for criterion importance elicitation) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. in 1963. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARTASI (Alternative Ranking Technique based on Adaptive Standardized Intervals) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatamängd ↗ |
|
|