Jämför metoder
Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.
| Solomon fyrgruppsdesign med crossover× | Experimentell design med kontrollgrupp× | |
|---|---|---|
| Ämnesområde | Försöksplanering | Försöksplanering |
| Familj | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ursprungsår≠ | 1949 (base design); crossover adaptation developed through later methodological literature | 1935 (Fisher); 1963 (Campbell & Stanley codification) |
| Upphovsperson≠ | Richard L. Solomon (base design); crossover extension via repeated-measures methodology | Ronald A. Fisher; systematised by Donald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley |
| Typ≠ | Experimental design (pretest-sensitization control + within-subjects crossover) | Experimental research design |
| Ursprungskälla≠ | Solomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 137–150. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | crossover S4G design, within-subjects Solomon design, repeated-measures Solomon four-group design | controlled experiment, true experimental design, randomized controlled design, treatment-control design |
| Närliggande≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Sammanfattning≠ | The Crossover Solomon Four-Group Design merges two powerful experimental strategies: the Solomon four-group design's control for pretest sensitization and the crossover design's within-subjects efficiency. Participants are randomly assigned to one of four groups that vary in whether they receive a pretest and in the sequence of treatment and control conditions, allowing the researcher to simultaneously estimate treatment effects, pretest effects, and their interaction while controlling for individual differences through repeated measurement. | Control group experimental design is a fundamental experimental structure in which participants are assigned to at least two groups — a treatment group that receives the intervention and a control group that does not — so that the effect of the intervention can be isolated by comparing outcomes across groups. Randomisation of assignment strengthens causal inference by balancing known and unknown confounders. |
| ScholarGateDatamängd ↗ |
|
|