ScholarGate
Assistent

Jämför metoder

Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.

Komplex Proportional Bedömning×Kriteriekorrelation och standardavvikelse objektiv viktning×
ÄmnesområdeBeslutsfattandeBeslutsfattande
FamiljMCDMMCDM
Ursprungsår19962010
UpphovspersonZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
UrsprungskällaZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Alias
Närliggande88
SammanfattningCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatamängd
  1. v1
  2. 1 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå till sökningen Ladda ner bildspel

ScholarGateJämför metoder: COPRAS · CCSD. Hämtad 2026-06-15 från https://scholargate.app/sv/compare