ScholarGate
Assistent

Jämför metoder

Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.

Analys av datoriserade adaptiva testobjekt×Item Response Theory (IRT)×
ÄmnesområdePsykometriPsykometri
FamiljLatent structureLatent structure
Ursprungsår1970s–1990s1952–1968
UpphovspersonLord, Weiss, and colleagues in psychometric research on adaptive testingFrederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)
TypItem calibration and evaluationProbabilistic measurement model
Ursprungskällavan der Linden, W. J. & Glas, C. A. W. (Eds.) (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN: 978-0792365556Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗
AliasCAT item analysis, adaptive item calibration, IRT-based CAT item evaluation, adaptive item parameter estimationIRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory
Närliggande65
SammanfattningComputerized adaptive test item analysis evaluates and calibrates items intended for use in adaptive testing environments. Unlike fixed-form analysis, it accounts for the non-random item exposure inherent in adaptive administration, using item response theory to estimate item parameters, information functions, and exposure rates across the ability continuum.Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.
ScholarGateDatamängd
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå till sökningen Ladda ner bildspel

ScholarGateJämför metoder: Computerized adaptive test item analysis · Item Response Theory. Hämtad 2026-06-18 från https://scholargate.app/sv/compare