Jämför metoder
Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.
| Blatant Dehumanization Scale× | Intergroup Threat Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Ämnesområde | Politisk psykologi | Politisk psykologi |
| Familj≠ | Latent structure | Process / pipeline |
| Ursprungsår≠ | 2015 | 1999 |
| Upphovsperson≠ | Nour Kteily, Emile Bruneau, Adam Waytz & Sarah Cotterill | Walter G. Stephan & Cookie White Stephan |
| Typ≠ | Graphic-slider measure of dehumanization | Self-report attitude scale |
| Ursprungskälla≠ | Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The Ascent of Man: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence for Blatant Dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 901-931. DOI ↗ | Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Bachman, G. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(11), 2221-2237. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Ascent of Man Scale, Ascent Dehumanization Measure, Kteily-Bruneau Dehumanization Scale, Blatant Animalistic Dehumanization Measure | Integrated Threat Scale, Realistic and Symbolic Threat Scale, Perceived Threat Scale |
| Närliggande≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Sammanfattning≠ | The Blatant Dehumanization Scale, also called the Ascent of Man measure, captures the willingness to overtly deny full humanity to an out-group. Developed by Nour Kteily, Emile Bruneau, Adam Waytz, and Sarah Cotterill in 2015, it uses the iconic evolutionary image of a creature progressing from ape to upright human and asks respondents to rate, on a slider from zero to one hundred, how evolved different social groups are. The gap between how human respondents rate their own group and how human they rate an out-group is a strikingly direct, robust predictor of hostility, support for coercive policies, and aggression that goes beyond ordinary dislike. | The Intergroup Threat Scale operationalizes intergroup (originally integrated) threat theory (Stephan & Stephan), which holds that prejudice toward an out-group arises from perceived realistic threats (to the in-group's resources, power, or welfare) and symbolic threats (to its values, beliefs, and worldview). It is a self-report measure widely used to explain attitudes toward immigrants and other out-groups in political psychology. |
| ScholarGateDatamängd ↗ |
|
|