Jämför metoder
Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.
| Adaptiv Fas II-klinisk prövning× | Fas II klinisk prövning× | |
|---|---|---|
| Ämnesområde | Epidemiologi | Epidemiologi |
| Familj | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ursprungsår≠ | 1994 (formal framework); widespread adoption 2000s–2010s | 1960s–1970s (formalised in US federal drug regulation) |
| Upphovsperson≠ | Peter Bauer & Klaus Kohne (formal statistical framework, 1994); broader adaptive trial methodology developed through FDA and ICH guidance in the 2000s | U.S. Food and Drug Administration / ICH E8 guidelines (institutionalised framework) |
| Typ≠ | Experimental clinical trial design | Interventional clinical study design |
| Ursprungskälla≠ | Bauer, P., & Kohne, K. (1994). Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. Biometrics, 50(4), 1029–1041. DOI ↗ | Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185392 |
| Alias | Adaptive Ph II trial, seamless adaptive Phase II, adaptive dose-finding trial, response-adaptive Phase II | Phase 2 trial, Phase II study, early efficacy trial, proof-of-concept trial |
| Närliggande≠ | 1 | 6 |
| Sammanfattning≠ | An adaptive Phase II clinical trial is a prospective experimental design in which pre-specified rules allow the study protocol to be modified — such as dropping arms, adjusting sample size, or narrowing the patient population — based on accumulating interim data, without inflating the Type I error rate. The design is widely used in early-phase drug development to screen candidate doses or treatments efficiently while preserving statistical validity. | A Phase II clinical trial is the second stage in the drug or intervention development pipeline, conducted after Phase I safety testing. Its primary goal is to assess whether the intervention shows preliminary efficacy signals in a relevant patient population at the dose established in Phase I, while continuing to characterise the safety and tolerability profile. Phase II trials are generally smaller than Phase III confirmatory trials and serve as critical go/no-go decision points before large-scale investment. |
| ScholarGateDatamängd ↗ |
|
|