ScholarGate
Asistenti
Process / pipelineSociology of scientific knowledge

Boundary-Work Analysis

Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.

Hapeni në MethodMindSë shpejtiZbatoni, krahasoni, merrni udhëzime
Mjete dhe burime
Shkarko diapozitivat
Mësoni dhe eksploroni
VideoSë shpejti

Lexoni metodën e plotë

Vetëm për anëtarët

Hyni me një llogari falas për ta lexuar këtë seksion.

Hyni

Harta e metodave

Lagjja e metodave të lidhura — zgjidhni një nyje për të eksploruar.

Burimet

  1. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325
  2. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625

Si ta citoni këtë faqe

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sq/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis

Cila metodë?

Vendoseni këtë metodë pranë të afërmeve të saj më të ngushta dhe lexojini krah për krah — biblioteka i shtron librat mbi tryezë; zgjedhja është e juaja.

Krahasoni krah për krah

Cituar nga

ScholarGateBoundary-Work Analysis (Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science)). Marrë më 2026-06-24 nga https://scholargate.app/sq/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis · Seti i të dhënave: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026