Regjistër i dëshmive metodologjike

Controversy Mapping

Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Regjistri burimor

Citimet kopjuar fjalë për fjalë nga regjistri burimor i metodës. Asnjë verifikim në nivel pretendimi nuk nënkuptohet prej tyre.

Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies)

Regjistri metodologjik taksonomik · process-pipeline / science-technology-studies

Hap metodën e plotë

Pretendime të kuruaruara

Pretendimet e ruajtura në librin e dëshmive, secili me vlerësimin e vet.

Asnjë pretendim i kuruaruar ende

Ky pamje nuk shpik një vlerësim pretendimi kur libri i dëshmive nuk ka asnjë.

Metoda të lidhura

Të gjeneruara nga grafiku metodologjik dhe të paraqitura si marrëdhënie të sugjeruara nga makina — asnjë pretendim dëshmie nuk nënkuptohet.

Same method familyActor-Network Theory Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyBoundary-Work Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySocial Construction of Technologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySociotechnical Imaginaries Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.