Krahasoni metodat

	Dizajni i përzier i metodave bashkëkohore të ngulitura, me dominim kualitativ	Dizajni i Metodave të Përziera me Prioritet Kualitativ
Fusha	Dizajni i hulumtimit	Dizajni i hulumtimit
Familja	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Viti i origjinës	2003–2011	1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies)
Krijuesi	Creswell & Plano Clark (embedded design); dominance weighting formalized in Teddlie & Tashakkori	Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Lloji	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Burimi themelues	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Emërtime të tjera	QUAL-dominant embedded concurrent design, qualitative-priority embedded mixed methods, concurrent nested mixed methods (QUAL dominant), QUAL+quan concurrent embedded design	QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods
Të lidhura	5	6
Përmbledhja	A qualitative-dominant concurrent embedded mixed methods design collects qualitative and quantitative data simultaneously, but the qualitative strand carries the primary weight — it drives the research questions, generates the main findings, and frames interpretation. The quantitative strand is embedded within the larger qualitative study to provide supplemental support, context-setting, or triangulation, without displacing the qualitative logic at the core.	Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story.