Záznam dôkazov metódy

Controversy Mapping

Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Zdrojový záznam

Citácie skopírované doslovne zo zdrojového záznamu metódy. Nevyplýva z nich žiadne overenie na úrovni tvrdenia.

Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies)

Taxonomický záznam metódy · process-pipeline / science-technology-studies

Otvoriť celú metódu

Spracované tvrdenia

Tvrdenia uložené v registri dôkazov, každé s vlastným hodnotením.

Zatiaľ žiadne spracované tvrdenia

Tento pohľad nevymýšľa hodnotenie tvrdenia, ak register žiadne nemá.

Súvisiace metódy

Vygenerované z grafu metód a zobrazené ako vzťahy navrhnuté strojom – nevyplýva z nich žiadne tvrdenie o dôkaze.

Same method familyActor-Network Theory Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyBoundary-Work Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySocial Construction of Technologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySociotechnical Imaginaries Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.