Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Шкала ксенофобии× | Шкала демократических ценностей× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Политическая социология | Политическая социология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2009–2016 | 1999–2015 |
| Автор метода≠ | Alin Ceobanu, Xavier Escandell, Elke Schlueter | Russell Dalton, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Christian Welzel |
| Тип | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Ceobanu, A. M., & Escandell, X. (2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: The European Social Survey. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(6), 953-969. link ↗ | Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press. link ↗ |
| Другие названия | XS, Anti-Immigration Attitude Scale | DVS, Democratic Attitudes Scale |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | The Xenophobia Scale measures fear, discomfort, or prejudice toward foreign nationals and immigrants. Unlike immigration policy preferences (which can reflect economic or pragmatic considerations), xenophobia captures affective and attitudinal dimensions—emotional threat perception, negative stereotypes, and cultural distance. Developed by migration scholars including Ceobanu and Escandell, it is essential for understanding antiforeign sentiment and discriminatory attitudes across diverse contexts. | The Democratic Values Scale measures commitment to core principles of democratic governance including free speech, rule of law, fair elections, protection of minorities, and transparent institutions. Rather than measuring support for democracy as a system (which is nearly universal in principle), it captures depth of commitment to democratic norms, tolerance for dissent, and willingness to protect rights of political opponents. Developed by comparative political scientists including Dalton, Klingemann, and Welzel, it reveals psychological foundations of democratic stability. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|