ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Взвешенный анализ мо-дулярности×Центральность по посредничеству×
ОбластьСетевой анализСетевой анализ
СемействоMachine learningMachine learning
Год появления20041977
Автор методаNewman, M. E. J.Freeman, L. C.
ТипCommunity structure optimization on weighted graphsCentrality measure
Основополагающий источникNewman, M. E. J. (2004). Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E, 70(5), 056131. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Другие названияweighted modularity, weighted Q optimization, weighted network community detection, strength-based modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Связанные56
СводкаWeighted modularity analysis extends the classical Newman-Girvan modularity measure to networks where edges carry numeric strengths (frequencies, intensities, costs). By replacing binary adjacency with tie weights, it finds community partitions that reflect how densely interconnected subgroups are relative to what is expected under a weighted null model, yielding more nuanced groupings than unweighted approaches on data where edge strength varies meaningfully.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Weighted Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Получено 2026-06-15 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare