Сравнение методов

	Web Controversy Analysis	Issue Mapping
Область	Science Technology Studies	Science Technology Studies
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	2012	2015
Автор метода	Tommaso Venturini, Noortje Marres	Noortje Marres, Richard Rogers
Тип	Web-native controversy research method	Issue-centred digital research method
Основополагающий источник	Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812.	Rogers, R., Sánchez-Querubín, N., & Kil, A. (2015). Issue Mapping for an Ageing Europe. Amsterdam University Press. ISBN: 9789089647160
Другие названия	Web controversy mapping, Hyperlink controversy analysis, Online controversy cartography	Issue cartography, Issue network mapping, Digital issue analysis
Связанные	4	4
Сводка	Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.	Issue mapping is an issue-centred digital research method that charts the actors, objects, and concerns gathered around a public issue—ageing, climate, vaccines, migration—using web and social-media data. Descended from controversy mapping but reoriented around the issue rather than a controversy or a pre-given social domain, it draws on Noortje Marres's pragmatist account of issue formation and the Amsterdam Digital Methods Initiative's repertoire to let the issue itself demarcate who and what counts.