ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Метаанализ с использованием VOSviewer×Коцитатный анализ×
ОбластьНаукометрияБиблиометрия
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления2010s (integration practice emerged after VOSviewer release in 2010)1973
Автор методаWorkflow combining Glass (1976) meta-analysis with van Eck & Waltman (2010) VOSviewerHenry Small
ТипTool-assisted evidence synthesis workflowMethod
Основополагающий источникvan Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Другие названияbibliometric-enhanced meta-analysis, VOSviewer meta-analysis workflow, science-mapping assisted meta-analysis, network-visualisation meta-analysisco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Связанные55
СводкаVOSviewer-assisted meta-analysis integrates the bibliometric network visualisation capabilities of VOSviewer into the literature identification and mapping phases of a standard meta-analysis. Before the statistical pooling of effect sizes begins, VOSviewer is used to visualise co-citation networks, keyword co-occurrence maps, and publication clusters, helping researchers comprehensively delineate the research field and identify all eligible primary studies for quantitative synthesis.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: VOSviewer-assisted meta-analysis · Co-Citation Analysis. Получено 2026-06-19 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare