Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Визуально-эвокативное исследование истории жизни× | Устная история× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Качественные методы | Качественные методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1990s–2000s (synthesis codified) | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology |
| Автор метода≠ | Convergence of photo-elicitation (John Collier Jr., 1957) and life history traditions (Thomas & Znaniecki, 1918; Plummer, 1983) | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Clark, C. D. (1999). The autodriven interview: A photographic viewfinder into children's experience. Visual Sociology, 14(1), 39–50. DOI ↗ | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 |
| Другие названия | photo-elicitation life history, visual life history interview, image-based life history method, VELHR | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research |
| Связанные≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Visual elicitation life history research is a qualitative method that combines the biographical depth of life history interviewing with the evocative power of photographs, personal objects, or other visual materials. Participants select or bring images that are meaningful to their life story; these visuals then serve as prompts during in-depth interviews, unlocking memories and meanings that words alone might not surface. The result is a richly layered biographical narrative grounded in concrete, participant-chosen artefacts. | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|