Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| VRAG: Руководство по оценке риска насилия× | LSI-R: Level of Service Inventory-Revised× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Судебная психология | Судебная психология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1993 | 1995 |
| Автор метода≠ | Grant T. Harris, Marnie E. Rice, Vernon L. Quinsey | D. A. Andrews, James Bonta |
| Тип≠ | Clinician-rated / File-based | Interview-based / File-based |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 6(4), 269–279. DOI ↗ | Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Department of Psychology, Carleton University. link ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | VRAG, Harris-Rice-Quinsey VRAG | LSI-R, LSI-R-SV, Andrews-Bonta Risk Assessment |
| Связанные | 4 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) is an actuarial instrument developed by Harris, Rice, and Quinsey (1993) to estimate the probability of violent recidivism among adult male offenders released from forensic psychiatric hospitals. It represents one of the earliest empirically validated violence prediction tools and remains widely used in correctional, forensic psychiatric, and civil commitment settings. The VRAG combines static historical variables with dynamic factors to generate a probability-based risk assessment. | The Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) is a 54-item assessment instrument developed by Andrews and Bonta (1995) to measure offender risk level and criminogenic needs (dynamic risk factors related to criminal behavior) in criminal justice populations. It is grounded in the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and is widely used in correctional facilities, probation/parole services, and forensic settings to inform release decisions, supervision intensity, treatment prioritization, and rehabilitation planning. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|