ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Value Conflict Measurement×Schwartz Value Survey×
ОбластьПолитическая психологияПолитическая психология
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19861992
Автор методаPhilip Tetlock; Stanley Feldman & John ZallerShalom H. Schwartz
ТипMeasurement of value conflict in political reasoningSelf-report values survey
Основополагающий источникTetlock, P. E. (1986). A Value Pluralism Model of Ideological Reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 819-827. DOI ↗Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. DOI ↗
Другие названияValue Pluralism Measurement, Political Ambivalence Measurement, Value Trade-off Measurement, Conflicting Considerations MeasureSVS, Schwartz Theory of Basic Values, Portrait Values Questionnaire
Связанные34
СводкаValue conflict measurement quantifies the tension citizens feel when an issue pits two values they both cherish against each other, and traces its cognitive consequences. Philip Tetlock's value pluralism model holds that people reason in integratively complex ways precisely when an issue activates conflicting values they regard as important and roughly equal in weight. Stanley Feldman and John Zaller showed that this conflict, between values such as equality and economic individualism over the welfare state, produces ambivalence: opinions built from opposing considerations that are unstable and sensitive to how questions are framed. Together these approaches measure value conflict and link it to complexity, ambivalence, and the instability of political attitudes.The Schwartz Value Survey (SVS) operationalizes Schwartz's (1992) theory of basic human values, which identifies ten (later refined to nineteen) motivationally distinct values organized in a circular structure along two axes: openness to change versus conservation, and self-enhancement versus self-transcendence. It is the most widely used cross-cultural values instrument and underlies much research on the value basis of political ideology.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Value Conflict Measurement · Schwartz Value Survey. Получено 2026-06-25 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare