ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

UTA*×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
ОбластьПринятие решенийПринятие решений
СемействоMCDMMCDM
Год появления19851995
Автор методаSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
ТипAdditive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgementsStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Основополагающий источникSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Другие названия
Связанные88
СводкаUTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: UTASTAR · CRITIC. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare