Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Исследовательский дневник с триангуляцией× | Триангулированные полевые заметки× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Методология опросов | Методология опросов |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1970s–1980s (triangulation formalized by Denzin 1978; diary methodology developed through 1980s) | 1970s–1980s |
| Автор метода≠ | Norman K. Denzin (triangulation framework); Mary Louise Holly (research diary practice) | Norman K. Denzin (triangulation); Yvonna Lincoln & Egon Guba (trustworthiness framework) |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative data collection and verification technique |
| Основополагающий источник | Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗ | Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗ |
| Другие названия | reflective diary triangulation, multi-method research journal, triangulated reflexive diary, diary-based triangulation | multi-source field notes, cross-observer field notes, triangulated observation notes, TFN |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | A Triangulated Research Diary is a qualitative data collection approach in which a researcher's ongoing reflective diary is used as one strand within a triangulated data collection strategy. The diary records observations, decisions, emotions, and emerging interpretations across the study, while at least one other data source — such as interviews, documents, or observations — is collected in parallel. Cross-checking diary entries against other sources increases the credibility and depth of the findings. | Triangulated Field Notes is a qualitative data collection technique in which field notes are recorded independently by multiple observers, from multiple vantage points, or at multiple time points and then systematically compared to strengthen the credibility and completeness of observational data. Rooted in Denzin's triangulation framework and Lincoln and Guba's trustworthiness criteria, the approach counters observer bias by cross-checking accounts before analysis begins. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|