Сравнение методов

	Анализ цитирования с разбивкой по времени	Библиометрический анализ
Область	Наукометрия	Наукометрия
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1955–1965 (foundational); temporal slicing formalized in scientometrics from the 1980s onward	1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
Автор метода	Eugene Garfield (citation analysis foundation); Derek J. de Solla Price (temporal/longitudinal framing)	Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
Тип	Quantitative scientometric technique	Quantitative literature analysis
Основополагающий источник	Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.	Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Другие названия	temporal citation analysis, longitudinal citation analysis, time-window citation analysis, diachronic citation analysis	bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Связанные	6	6
Сводка	Time-sliced citation analysis partitions a body of literature into sequential temporal windows — for example, five-year intervals — and performs citation analysis within and across each window. This reveals how citation patterns, influential papers, and knowledge flows shift over time, providing a dynamic picture of a field's intellectual evolution rather than a static aggregate snapshot.	Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.