ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Theory-Based Impact Evaluation×Logical Framework Approach×
ОбластьDevelopment StudiesDevelopment Studies
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления20091969
Автор методаCarol Weiss; Howard White (3ie)Leon Rosenberg / Practical Concepts Inc. for USAID; later NORAD, GTZ, European Commission
ТипEvaluation approach / frameworkProject planning, monitoring and evaluation framework
Основополагающий источникWhite, H. (2009). Theory-Based Impact Evaluation: Principles and Practice. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1(3), 271–284. DOI ↗NORAD (1999). The Logical Framework Approach (LFA): Handbook for Objectives-Oriented Planning (4th ed.). Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, Oslo. link ↗
Другие названияTheory of Change Evaluation, Contribution Analysis, Theory-Driven Evaluation, Causal-Chain Impact EvaluationLogframe, LFA, Logical Framework Matrix, Objectives-Oriented Planning
Связанные44
СводкаTheory-based impact evaluation evaluates a programme by first making explicit the theory of change — the causal chain of assumptions and mechanisms through which inputs are expected to produce outcomes and impacts — and then gathering evidence to test whether each link in that chain holds. Rather than treating the programme as a black box and estimating only the net effect, it asks not just whether a programme worked but why, for whom, and under what conditions. Articulated by Carol Weiss and brought into development practice by Howard White and 3ie, it complements, rather than competes with, counterfactual designs.The Logical Framework Approach (Logframe) is a structured planning, monitoring, and evaluation method that distils an intervention into a single four-by-four matrix linking a hierarchy of objectives to the indicators, evidence, and external conditions on which success depends. Originated by Leon Rosenberg of Practical Concepts Incorporated for USAID in 1969 and elaborated by agencies such as GTZ, NORAD, and the European Commission, it forces planners to make explicit the causal logic by which activities are expected to produce outputs, outcomes, and ultimately a development goal.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Theory-Based Impact Evaluation · Logical Framework Approach. Получено 2026-06-24 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare