ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Системная функциональная лингвистика×Дискурс-анализ×
ОбластьЛингвистикаКачественные исследования
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19611989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
Автор методаMichael HallidayNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
ТипEmpirical process pipelineMethod
Основополагающий источникHalliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold. link ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
Другие названияSFL, Hallidayan LinguisticsDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
Связанные12
СводкаSystemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) is a framework for analyzing language developed by Michael Halliday, viewing language as a system of meaning-making choices where speakers select from available options to express meanings. The approach emphasizes the relationship between language form and social context, analyzing how register (field, tenor, mode) shapes linguistic choices and how language constructs meaning through metafunctional systems (ideational, interpersonal, textual). SFL is widely applied to discourse analysis, language education, and computational linguistics.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Systemic Functional Linguistics · Discourse Analysis. Получено 2026-06-17 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare