Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Тест SURE для скрининга конфликтности принятия решений× | Инструмент расширения прав и возможностей пациента× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Пациентоориентированная помощь | Пациентоориентированная помощь |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2010 | 1998 |
| Автор метода≠ | Annette O'Connor | J. G. Howie |
| Тип | Patient-reported | Patient-reported |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | O'Connor, A. M. (2010). Using the Decisional Conflict Scale to evaluate a decision aid. In A. Edwards & G. Elwyn (Eds.), Shared Decision Making in Health Care (pp. 424-438). Oxford University Press. link ↗ | Howie, J. G., Heaney, D. J., Maxwell, M., & Zwanenberg, D. (1998). A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two other consultations outcome measures. British Journal of General Practice, 48(427), 1211-1216. link ↗ |
| Другие названия | SURE Screening Tool, Decisional Conflict Screener | PEI, Patient Enablement Score |
| Связанные | 4 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | The SURE Test is a four-item screening questionnaire designed to rapidly identify patients experiencing decisional conflict—uncertainty or difficulty in making healthcare decisions. Developed by Annette O'Connor and colleagues, the SURE Test is an abbreviated, practical version of the longer Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), created to detect patients who may benefit from decision support or additional counselling. It is widely used in clinical and research settings for quick, valid screening. | The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a brief, validated six-item questionnaire that measures the degree to which a clinical consultation leaves the patient feeling more capable of understanding and managing their health condition. Developed by Howie and colleagues in 1998, the PEI assesses whether the consultation helped the patient understand their problem, cope with their illness, and manage their health more effectively. The scale captures the empowering effect of good clinical practice and is widely used in general practice research, quality improvement, and studies evaluating patient-centered and collaborative consultation styles. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|