ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Оптимизация планировки очистных выработок×Рейтинг массива горных пород (RMR)×
ОбластьГорное делоГорное дело
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19601973
Автор методаMining Engineering PracticeZbigniew T. Bieniawski
ТипOptimization framework for underground mine excavation designEmpirical classification for geotechnical engineering
Основополагающий источникBrady, B. H. G., & Brown, E. T. (2004). Rock mechanics for underground mining. Springer Science+Business Media. link ↗Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering rock mass classifications. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0-471-60437-4
Другие названияStope Design, Underground Mine Layout, Panel DesignRMR, Bieniawski Classification, RMR89
Связанные33
СводкаStope layout optimization is the process of designing the size, shape, and spatial arrangement of underground mine excavations (stopes) to maximize ore recovery while maintaining safety and economic viability. It balances the desire for large extraction volumes against rock mechanics constraints and support costs. The layout determines mining productivity, capital investment in support systems, and long-term mine life.The Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system, developed by Zbigniew Bieniawski starting in 1973, is an empirical classification that characterizes rock mass quality and estimates mining and civil engineering behavior. RMR combines five measurable geotechnical parameters into a single index ranging from 0 to 100, where higher values indicate stronger, more stable rock masses. It is the most widely used rock classification system worldwide for underground mining design.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Stope Layout · Rock Mass Rating. Получено 2026-06-19 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare