ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Теория речевых актов×Дискурс-анализ×
ОбластьЛингвистикаКачественные исследования
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19621989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
Автор методаJ. L. AustinNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
ТипEmpirical process pipelineMethod
Основополагающий источникAustin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
Другие названияPragmatics, Performative AnalysisDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
Связанные12
СводкаSpeech Act Theory is a framework in pragmatics developed by J. L. Austin and refined by John Searle, analyzing language as action. The core insight is that utterances are not merely vehicles for propositions but acts with pragmatic effects: 'I pronounce you married' creates a marriage; 'Please close the door' issues a request; 'I promise to help' incurs an obligation. By examining the conditions under which acts succeed and the types of effects they produce, Speech Act Theory illuminates how language functions in social interaction.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Speech Act Theory · Discourse Analysis. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare