Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Пространственный метод подбора пар× | Метод подбора на основе оценки склонности× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Причинно-следственный вывод | Статистика исследований |
| Семейство≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1983 |
| Автор метода≠ | Extension of Abadie & Imbens (2006) matching estimator to spatial settings; geographic applications developed in urban/environmental econometrics literature | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Тип≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235-267. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | geographic matching estimator, spatial nearest-neighbor matching, location-based matching estimator, spatially-weighted matching | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | The Spatial Matching Estimator estimates causal treatment effects by pairing each treated geographic unit with one or more similar untreated units nearby, exploiting the assumption that units close in space share similar unobserved characteristics. By restricting matches to a geographic neighbourhood or weighting by spatial proximity, the method controls for location-specific confounders that standard matching ignores. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|