Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Шкала социальной сплоченности× | Шкала принадлежности к сообществу× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Политическая социология | Политическая социология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1997–2006 | 1974–1999 |
| Автор метода≠ | Robert Sampson, Ray Forrest, Akhtar Kearns | Seymour Sarason, David McMillan, David Chavis |
| Тип | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918-924. DOI ↗ | Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. Jossey-Bass. link ↗ |
| Другие названия | SCS, Social Integration Index | CBS, Community Integration Scale |
| Связанные | 5 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | The Social Cohesion Scale measures the degree to which members of a community feel integrated, connected, and unified by shared values and mutual support. Developed across multiple traditions—notably by Robert Sampson and colleagues in criminology and urban sociology, and by Forrest & Kearns in housing research—it assesses both the structural glue (institutions, networks) and affective bonds (belonging, solidarity) that hold communities together. | The Community Belonging Scale measures the subjective psychological sense of community—the feeling that one belongs, is accepted, and is valued within one's community. Distinct from objective measures of networks or participation, it captures the affective experience of community integration. Developed by Seymour Sarason and refined by McMillan and Chavis, it is grounded in community psychology and emphasizes that belonging is fundamental to mental health and social well-being. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|