Сравнение методов

	Одностороннего слепого экспериментального дизайна с единичным испытуемым	Дизайн с множественными базовыми линиями
Область	Планирование эксперимента	Планирование эксперимента
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1970s–1984 (consolidated)	1968
Автор метода	Barlow & Hersen (single-subject methodology); blinding conventions from clinical trial tradition	Donald M. Baer, Montrose M. Wolf, Todd R. Risley
Тип	Controlled experimental design variant	Single-subject experimental design
Основополагающий источник	Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). Pergamon Press. ISBN: 978-0080302378	Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97.
Другие названия	single-blind N-of-1 design, SB-SSED, single-blind within-subject design, single-blind single-case experimental design	MBD, multiple-baseline single-case design, staggered baseline design, multiple-probe design
Связанные	6	4
Сводка	A single-blind single-subject experimental design (SB-SSED) applies a single-blind protocol to an N-of-1 experiment: one individual participant is studied intensively across alternating or sequential phases, and either the participant or the assessor — but not both — is kept unaware of the current treatment condition. This design combines the idiographic power of single-subject methodology with a structured blinding control to reduce performance or assessment bias, and is common in applied behavior analysis, clinical psychology, and rehabilitation research.	The multiple baseline design is a single-subject experimental design that demonstrates functional control by introducing an intervention at staggered time points across two or more baselines — typically across different behaviors, individuals, or settings. Because no withdrawal of treatment is required, it is especially suitable when the target behavior is irreversible or when removing an effective intervention would be unethical.