ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Односторонний слепой лабораторный эксперимент×Экспериментальный дизайн с контрольной группой×
ОбластьПланирование экспериментаПланирование эксперимента
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появленияLate 19th century; codified in 20th-century clinical and behavioral research1935 (Fisher); 1963 (Campbell & Stanley codification)
Автор методаFormalized in experimental psychology and pharmacology; Peirce & Jastrow (1884) early instanceRonald A. Fisher; systematised by Donald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley
ТипControlled experimental designExperimental research design
Основополагающий источникShadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 978-0395615560Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗
Другие названияsingle-masked laboratory study, participant-blind lab experiment, single-blind controlled lab studycontrolled experiment, true experimental design, randomized controlled design, treatment-control design
Связанные54
СводкаA single-blind laboratory experiment is a controlled study conducted in a laboratory setting in which participants do not know which condition (e.g., treatment or control) they have been assigned to, while the researchers administering the conditions are aware. This masking of participants reduces demand characteristics and response bias without requiring full investigator blinding, and the controlled laboratory environment allows tight manipulation of independent variables and precise measurement of outcomes.Control group experimental design is a fundamental experimental structure in which participants are assigned to at least two groups — a treatment group that receives the intervention and a control group that does not — so that the effect of the intervention can be isolated by comparing outcomes across groups. Randomisation of assignment strengthens causal inference by balancing known and unknown confounders.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Single-blind laboratory experiment · Control Group Experimental Design. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare