Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Односторонний полевой эксперимент× | Одностороннее рандомизированное контролируемое исследование× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Планирование эксперимента | Планирование эксперимента |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | Mid-20th century (blinding conventions formalised 1940s–1960s) | 1948 (formalized); single-blind variant established in mid-20th century clinical trial methodology |
| Автор метода≠ | Established practice in experimental social science and clinical research; codified by Campbell & Stanley (1963) and Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002) | Bradford Hill and colleagues (MRC streptomycin trial, 1948); blinding conventions codified in CONSORT guidelines |
| Тип≠ | Controlled field experiment with partial blinding | Experimental design — blinded randomized trial |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 978-0395615560 | Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | single-masked field experiment, field experiment with single blinding, single-blind natural-setting trial | single-masked RCT, single-blind RCT, single-blind trial, SB-RCT |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | A single-blind field experiment combines real-world experimental conditions with partial blinding: either participants or outcome assessors — but not both — are kept unaware of treatment assignment. This design reduces demand characteristics or observer bias while preserving ecological validity, making it a practical middle ground when full double-blinding is logistically infeasible in naturalistic settings. | A single-blind randomized controlled trial (SB-RCT) is a rigorous experimental design in which participants are randomly assigned to treatment or control conditions while remaining unaware of which condition they have received. Investigators, outcome assessors, and data analysts are not blinded. By masking participants, the design eliminates placebo and nocebo response biases on the participant side, while preserving investigator flexibility to administer and monitor the intervention. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|