Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Обзор области применения (Scoping Review)× | Библиометрический анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Наукометрия | Наукометрия |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2005 | 1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s |
| Автор метода≠ | Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley | Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934) |
| Тип≠ | Evidence synthesis review design | Quantitative literature analysis |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗ | Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗ |
| Другие названия | scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map | bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis |
| Связанные | 6 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible. | Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|