ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Разработка шкалы×Конструктная валидность×
ОбластьПсихометрияПсихометрия
СемействоLatent structureLatent structure
Год появления1991–19951955
Автор методаMultiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David WatsonLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
ТипMulti-step methodological frameworkValidity evaluation framework
Основополагающий источникDeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
Другие названияquestionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale buildingconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Связанные56
СводкаScale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Download slides

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Scale development · Construct Validity. Получено 2026-06-15 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare