ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

ROUGH-TOPSIS×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
ОбластьПринятие решенийПринятие решений
СемействоMCDMMCDM
Год появления20131995
Автор методаSong, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
ТипRough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Основополагающий источникSong, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z. (2013). An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Другие названия
Связанные88
СводкаROUGH-TOPSIS (Rough-TOPSIS — Rough extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: ROUGH-TOPSIS · CRITIC. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare