Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Анализ конкурирующих рисков с поправкой на риск× | Метод подбора на основе оценки склонности× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Эпидемиология | Статистика исследований |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1999 (subdistribution hazard model); cause-specific hazard framework earlier | 1983 |
| Автор метода≠ | Jason Fine and Robert Gray | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Тип≠ | Regression model for time-to-event data with competing events | Method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | competing risks regression, subdistribution hazard model, cause-specific hazard analysis, Fine-Gray model | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Связанные≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | Risk-adjusted competing risks analysis extends classical survival analysis to settings where subjects can experience more than one type of terminal event, and where the occurrence of one event prevents the occurrence of another. By modelling cause-specific or subdistribution hazards while adjusting for measured confounders, the method yields unbiased estimates of the absolute probability — the cumulative incidence function — of each event type over time in the presence of competing events. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|