ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Ретроспективное клиническое исследование III фазы×Рандомизированное контролируемое испытание (РКИ)×
ОбластьЭпидемиологияЭпидемиология
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появленияLate 20th century (ICH E8 1997; widespread retrospective Phase III use from 1990s onward)1948 (first rigorously conducted RCT — MRC streptomycin trial)
Автор методаRegulatory framework codified by ICH E8/E9 (1997–1998); retrospective application developed through post-marketing and registry practiceAustin Bradford Hill; MRC Streptomycin Trial team
ТипRetrospective comparative clinical studyInterventional experimental study
Основополагающий источникFriedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., & DeMets, D. L. (2010). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (4th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-1441915856Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185385
Другие названияretrospective Phase III study, historical Phase III trial, Phase III retrospective analysis, retrospective comparative efficacy trialRCT, randomized controlled trial, randomised controlled trial, clinical randomized trial
Связанные56
СводкаA retrospective Phase III clinical trial evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of an intervention against a control using data that were collected before the study was designed. Rather than enrolling new patients prospectively, researchers analyze existing records — from registries, hospital databases, or historical trial archives — to address a Phase III-level question: does Treatment A outperform the current standard of care in a large, representative patient population? This design is used when prospective enrollment is infeasible, unethical, or when historical data are sufficiently complete to support a rigorous comparison.A randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study design in which participants are randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group, then followed prospectively to compare outcomes. Random allocation is the defining feature: it distributes known and unknown confounders across groups by chance, making the RCT the strongest individual study design for establishing causal efficacy of a treatment or intervention under controlled conditions.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Retrospective phase III clinical trial · Randomized clinical trial. Получено 2026-06-20 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare