Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Ретроспективный отчет о случае× | Ретроспективная серия случаев× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Эпидемиология | Эпидемиология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 19th century (formalized ~2013 with CARE guidelines) | Long-standing practice; codified in EBM frameworks during 1990s–2000s |
| Автор метода≠ | Case reporting tradition in medicine (formalized by CARE guidelines, Riley et al., 2013) | Clinical medicine tradition (no single originator); formalized in evidence-based medicine literature |
| Тип≠ | Observational descriptive study | Observational descriptive study design |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Gagnier, J. J., Kienle, G., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Sox, H., & Riley, D. (2013). The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 7(1), 223. DOI ↗ | Kooistra, B., Dijkman, B., Einhorn, T. A., & Bhandari, M. (2009). How to design a good case series. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 91(Suppl 3), 21–26. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | retrospective case study, post-hoc case report, retrospective clinical case, case report | retrospective case series, chart review case series, historical case series, medical records case series |
| Связанные | 4 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | A retrospective case report is a detailed, structured narrative of a single patient's clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcome, assembled from existing medical records after the clinical events have occurred. It is the most granular and accessible observational design in clinical medicine, serving primarily to document rare presentations, unexpected outcomes, novel treatments, or unusual drug reactions that would not otherwise enter the published literature. | A retrospective case series is an observational study that systematically describes the clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of a defined group of patients by examining pre-existing medical records or administrative data. It looks backward in time — data have already been recorded before the study begins. With no control group, no randomization, and no prospective follow-up, it sits near the base of the evidence hierarchy but remains one of the most practical and frequently published study designs in clinical medicine. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|