Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Быстрый обзор× | Нарративный обзор× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Наукометрия | Наукометрия |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2000s (rapidly adopted after 2005; Cochrane guidance 2020–2021) | Pre-20th century practice; peer-reviewed methodological guidance from 2000s onward |
| Автор метода≠ | Developed and formalised by health technology assessment agencies and the Cochrane Collaboration | Traditional academic practice; formalized discussion by Green, Johnson & Adams (2006) |
| Тип≠ | Evidence synthesis review | Literature review methodology |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Garritty, C., Gartlehner, G., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., King, V. J., Hamel, C., Kamel, C., Affengruber, L., & Stevens, A. (2021). Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 130, 13–22. DOI ↗ | Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | rapid evidence review, accelerated systematic review, rapid evidence assessment, REA | traditional review, expert review, unsystematic review, narrative synthesis |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | A rapid review is a streamlined form of systematic review that deliberately simplifies or omits certain steps — such as dual screening, exhaustive grey-literature search, or full risk-of-bias assessment — in order to deliver timely, policy-relevant evidence synthesis within weeks rather than years. It is increasingly used by health agencies, governments, and organisations facing urgent decision-making needs where a full systematic review is not feasible within the available time and resources. | A narrative review is a broad, author-directed synthesis of published literature on a topic, written to summarize, interpret, and contextualize existing knowledge without following the rigorous, pre-registered search and selection protocols that characterize systematic reviews. It draws on the author's expertise to weave disparate sources into a coherent account that identifies themes, debates, and directions for future research. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|