Сравнение методов

	Queer Methodology	Критический дискурс-анализ
Область	Gender Studies	Качественные методы
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	2010	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
Автор метода	Kath Browne, Catherine J. Nash, Jack Halberstam	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
Тип	Critical anti-normative research methodology	Qualitative research method
Основополагающий источник	Browne, K., & Nash, C. J. (Eds.) (2010). Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research. Ashgate, Surrey. ISBN: 9780754678434	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Другие названия	Queer Methods, Queer Research Methodology	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
Связанные	4	6
Сводка	Queer methodology is less a fixed technique than a critical stance toward research that disrupts taken-for-granted categories of sex, gender, and sexuality and resists the assumption that identities are stable, knowable, and countable. Articulated for the social sciences in Kath Browne and Catherine Nash's Queer Methods and Methodologies (2010) and prefigured in Jack Halberstam's notion of a 'scavenger' methodology, it asks not 'what is the right method?' but 'how does research itself reproduce normativity?' — and licenses researchers to borrow and combine methods rhizomatically in order to attend to fluidity, ambiguity, and the very production of the normal.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.