ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Критерии достоверности в качественных исследованиях×Метод углубленного интервью×
ОбластьКачественные исследованияКачественные исследования
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19851954
Автор методаYvonna Lincoln and Egon GubaCarl Rogers and Herbert H. Hyman
ТипFrameworkMethod
Основополагающий источникLincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0761908631
Другие названияtrustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmabilityIDI, qualitative interview, one-on-one interview, in-depth interviewing
Связанные45
СводкаTrustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.In-depth interviews are a qualitative research method in which a trained interviewer conducts one-on-one conversations with individual participants using open-ended questions to explore their experiences, perspectives, and understandings of a phenomenon. Developed in the 1950s by Rogers and Hyman, the method varies along a spectrum from structured (standardized question sets) to semi-structured (guided topic areas with flexibility) to unstructured (emergent, conversational). In-depth interviews are widely used in sociology, psychology, health sciences, anthropology, and organizational research to capture rich, detailed narratives and personal meaning.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 4 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research · In-Depth Interview Method. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare