Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Прагматический смешанный метод с доминированием качественной составляющей× | Смешанный дизайн с приоритетом качественного исследования× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Дизайн исследования | Дизайн исследования |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1990s–2010s | 1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies) |
| Автор метода≠ | David L. Morgan; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark | Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Тип | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Sage. ISBN: 978-1452204949 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Другие названия | QUAL-dominant pragmatic MMR, qualitative-priority pragmatic mixed methods, qual-dominant pragmatic design, QUAL+quan pragmatic | QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods |
| Связанные | 6 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Qualitative-dominant pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which a qualitative strand carries the primary weight of the inquiry, while a smaller quantitative component adds breadth or corroboration. Grounded in pragmatism as its philosophical framework, the design treats questions of data type, sequence, and integration as practical choices driven by the research problem rather than by methodological ideology. | Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|