Сравнение методов

	Протокольная мета-этнография	Обзор области применения (Scoping Review)
Область	Наукометрия	Наукометрия
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1988 (meta-ethnography); protocol-based practice formalised 2010s	2005
Автор метода	Noblit & Hare (meta-ethnography); protocol registration formalised through PROSPERO and eMERGe guidance	Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
Тип	Qualitative evidence synthesis with pre-registered protocol	Evidence synthesis review design
Основополагающий источник	Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930742	Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Другие названия	pre-registered meta-ethnography, prospero meta-ethnography, registered qualitative synthesis, protocol-driven meta-ethnography	scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
Связанные	5	6
Сводка	Protocol-based meta-ethnography is a structured qualitative evidence synthesis that follows Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnography method while requiring a pre-registered, publicly available protocol — typically on PROSPERO — before the review is conducted. Pre-registration constrains post-hoc decision-making, enhances methodological transparency, and aligns qualitative synthesis with the rigour standards now expected by leading journals and funders.	A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.