ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Проспективное экологическое исследование×Поперечное эпидемиологическое исследование×
ОбластьЭпидемиологияЭпидемиология
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления1950s–1970s (ecological epidemiology); prospective variant widely applied from 1980s onward1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century
Автор методаEcological study design formalised in epidemiology mid-20th century; prospective variant established through environmental and chronic disease researchClassical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)
ТипObservational epidemiological study designObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design
Основополагающий источникMorgenstern, H. (1998). Ecological studies. In K. J. Rothman & S. Greenland (Eds.), Modern Epidemiology (2nd ed., pp. 459–480). Lippincott-Raven. link ↗Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407
Другие названияprospective ecologic study, prospective aggregate-level study, prospective group-level study, ecological cohort studyprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design
Связанные46
СводкаA prospective ecological study is an observational epidemiological design in which groups — not individuals — serve as the unit of analysis, and exposure data are collected going forward in time before outcomes are measured. Investigators define geographically, politically, or socially bounded populations, characterise their aggregate exposures at baseline, then ascertain group-level outcomes (disease rates, mortality rates) at one or more later time points. Because exposure precedes outcome measurement, this design provides stronger temporal evidence than retrospective ecological studies.A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Prospective Ecological Study · Cross-sectional epidemiological study. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare