ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Обнаружение пропаганды×Классификация текстов×
ОбластьИнтеллектуальный анализ текстаИнтеллектуальный анализ текста
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления
Автор метода
ТипNLP text-classification taskSupervised NLP classification task
Основополагающий источникDa San Martino, G. et al. (2019). Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articles. EMNLP. DOI ↗Joachims, T. (1998). Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features. ECML 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1398. Springer. DOI ↗
Другие названияpropaganda and manipulation detection, propaganda technique detection, Propaganda ve Manipülasyon Tespititext categorization, document classification, topic classification, metin sınıflandırma
Связанные44
СводкаPropaganda detection is a natural-language-processing task that automatically identifies and labels persuasion and manipulation techniques in text — such as loaded language, oversimplified solutions, bandwagon appeals, and glittering generalities. It builds on the fine-grained propaganda analysis introduced by Da San Martino et al. (2019), turning rhetorical manipulation into structured, technique-level labels.Text classification, also called text categorization, is a supervised natural-language-processing task that automatically assigns documents to predefined categories. Building on the support-vector-machine approach to text categorization established by Joachims (1998) and consolidated in the text-mining literature by Aggarwal and Zhai (2012), it powers tasks such as spam detection and topic classification by learning from labelled examples.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Propaganda Detection · Text Classification. Получено 2026-06-17 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare