Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Poverty Probability Index× | Multidimensional Poverty Index× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Development Studies | Экономика |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2005 | 2011 |
| Автор метода≠ | Mark Schreiner; Grameen Foundation (now Innovations for Poverty Action) | Sabina Alkire & James Foster |
| Тип≠ | Poverty-likelihood scoring instrument | Counting-based multidimensional poverty measure |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Schreiner, M. (2016). The Poverty Probability Index (PPI): A Brief on Calculating Annual Poverty Rates and Movement Across a Poverty Line. Innovations for Poverty Action / PovertyIndex.org. link ↗ | Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | PPI, Progress out of Poverty Index, Poverty Scorecard, Poverty Likelihood Scorecard | MPI, Alkire-Foster Method, Adjusted Headcount Ratio, Dual-Cutoff Multidimensional Poverty |
| Связанные≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | The Poverty Probability Index (PPI), formerly the Progress out of Poverty Index, is a simple, country-specific scorecard that estimates the likelihood that a household is living below a given poverty line. Developed by Mark Schreiner and disseminated first by the Grameen Foundation and later by Innovations for Poverty Action, it reduces poverty measurement to ten easy-to-answer, verifiable questions about household characteristics. The answers produce a score from 0 to 100, which a calibration table converts into the probability that the household falls below national or international poverty lines — a low-cost alternative to a full consumption survey for organizations that need to track the poverty profile of the people they serve. | The Multidimensional Poverty Index applies the Alkire-Foster method, introduced by Sabina Alkire and James Foster in 2011, to measure poverty as the joint deprivation of individuals across several dimensions such as health, education, and living standards. Its signature is a dual-cutoff identification: a person is deprived in an indicator if they fall below that indicator's cutoff, and they are counted as multidimensionally poor only if their weighted count of deprivations crosses a cross-dimensional cutoff k. The headline measure is the adjusted headcount ratio M0 = H times A, the product of the share of people who are poor (incidence) and the average breadth of their deprivations (intensity). |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|