Сравнение методов

	Анализ со-цитирования, соответствующий PRISMA	Обзор на основе PRISMA
Область	Наукометрия	Наукометрия
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	2009–2021 (methodological combination emerged in the 2010s)	2009 (original PRISMA statement); updated 2020
Автор метода	PRISMA: Moher et al. (2009), updated Page et al. (2021); Co-citation: Henry Small (1973)	David Moher and PRISMA Group
Тип	Systematic bibliometric review	Structured reporting framework for systematic reviews
Основополагающий источник	Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.	Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
Другие названия	systematic co-citation review, PRISMA co-citation, co-citation analysis with PRISMA reporting, transparent co-citation analysis	PRISMA review, PRISMA-guided systematic review, PRISMA 2020 review, PRISMA-compliant review
Связанные	6	5
Сводка	PRISMA-compliant co-citation analysis is a systematic bibliometric method that applies the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework to co-citation analysis. It identifies intellectual clusters in a research field by measuring how frequently pairs of documents are cited together, while ensuring full transparency of the literature search, screening decisions, and analytic choices through a pre-registered protocol and standardised flow diagram.	A PRISMA-based review is a systematic literature review conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Originally published by Moher et al. in 2009 and updated as PRISMA 2020 by Page et al., the framework specifies a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram covering identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion — ensuring full transparency and reproducibility in the review process.