Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Прагматичное рандомизированное контролируемое исследование× | Рандомизированное контролируемое испытание (РКИ)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Эпидемиология | Эпидемиология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1967 | 1948 (first rigorously conducted RCT — MRC streptomycin trial) |
| Автор метода≠ | Daniel Schwartz & Joseph Lellouch | Austin Bradford Hill; MRC Streptomycin Trial team |
| Тип≠ | Interventional study design | Interventional experimental study |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗ | Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185385 |
| Другие названия | pragmatic RCT, effectiveness trial, real-world RCT, practical clinical trial | RCT, randomized controlled trial, randomised controlled trial, clinical randomized trial |
| Связанные | 6 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (pragmatic RCT) is an interventional study that tests whether a treatment works under routine clinical conditions, as opposed to the tightly controlled setting of an explanatory trial. It prioritizes broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and patient-relevant outcomes to answer the question 'Does this treatment work in everyday practice?' rather than 'Can this treatment work under ideal circumstances?' The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory trials was formally articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967 and operationalized by the PRECIS tool in 2009. | A randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study design in which participants are randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group, then followed prospectively to compare outcomes. Random allocation is the defining feature: it distributes known and unknown confounders across groups by chance, making the RCT the strongest individual study design for establishing causal efficacy of a treatment or intervention under controlled conditions. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|